Flexibility of Thought…

By David Power • on October 17, 2009
Square Peg and Round Hole 1

http://david-pow

In order for psychologists to work out how flexible people think a simple question was asked,” Can you fit a square peg in to a round hole?” The responses are varied but in general there were 4 main type of responses that you could come to expect.

1. Give me a big enough hammer and I’ll try. This type of answer is a reactive form of response. What does this indicate? determination for sure ,but unfortunately it focuses all energy in to only one reactive  type of solution. This answer could result in the danger that peg, hole, and hammer will all become damaged or broken in someone way in the process. It is not a a great way of thinking and it does not illicit an array of solutions when presented with a problem.

2. No, I can’t do it ( no You  can’t do it ). This reply is defeatist in nature and it is a reactive response to the situation and information presented and is demonstrates the ultimate form of inflexibility when it comes to an individual’s way of thinking, illustrated quite clearly by the words, ‘I can’t do it’. These words are dis-empowering and communicate directly to the subconscious mind the message of refusal to change or be adaptive in anyway, the absolute form self-doubt. This way of talking with oneself and others encourages your unconscious to concentrate on what is impossible as opposed to what is possible. A better and more honest approach would be to say something like,’ I haven’t learnt how to do that yet’, or ‘ I haven’t found a way of doing that yet.’ Why is this important? in a business or customer environment, people are not interested in the least in what you can not do for them, they want to know what you can do and offer them. Therefore, in a commercial sense, language is a powerful factor on how you change and alter people’s behaviour and learning.

3. Yes, If I was to reshape the square peg so that it fits. This type of reply is generally a fallacious method of reasoning, in order for the square pegs to fit you must reshape them so they fit in to round holes. It can be amazing just how many companies and individuals take on this type of thought processing when dealing with a problem. This is not much of an improvement on the other two responses and is just as inflexible as number 1. It is still a way of reacting to the situation and information.

4. What would be the reason for the fit and how did a square ever be offered as the solution  to a round hole in the first place? This type of response is inquisitive in its nature and the most flexible of them all. Why? Because its curiosity looks to discover the intention behind the question, i.e. it does not presuppose that the aim is to fit a square peg in to a round hole in the first place.  Flexibility is being able to have a frame of mind whereby you are able to produce  the desired results regardless of the current situation, the difficulties,  uncertainties, pace, culture or politics. In order for a person to survive change, to successfully adapt and then thrive they require some level of flexibility that has to be proportional to the potential variation or the uncertainty in the rest of the person’s thinking system. What does that mean to you and I? in the context of business, it shows that managers never should be content with one solution, rather they must challenge what is presupposed and look at wider influences in the organisation and generate as many different and alternative courses of action to cover all possible outcomes and eventualities. This is known as ‘The Law of Requisite Variety’.

To conclude, whenever you are confronted with new and uncertain challenges, you will discover you are likely to have one of the four following responses in your thought processes:

  1. Reaction.
  2. Defeat.
  3. Sophistry.
  4. Curisosity.

The person who chooses option 4  and thinks in a flexible manner will likely be more successful in accomplishing their goals.

David Power

Medical Hypnosis Expert and Practical Parenting Expert

 David Power’s Hour


No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis

Comments

By Martin on October 17th, 2009 at 4:36 PM

My reaction (before reading on) was: Why would you want to do that?
I think I passed!

Reactions 1 and 3 have been particularly prevalent in businesses I’ve worked in. “Let’s change the person to how we want them to be”!

http://www.martin-wright.com

By Vicki on October 17th, 2009 at 5:49 PM

#1 would be my humor side answer but #4 is where I was headed before I finished reading. Might have something to do with my career and why I like it.
Vicki http://www.bridal-threads.com

By Vegas Boomer Dating Expert on October 17th, 2009 at 6:14 PM

Hi David,

what an excellent post on how the brain think and an interesting study on the flexibility of our thought. I think I am the first of the 4 responses on a knee jerk level, and then have learned, to pause, breath and inquire behind the questions being asked.

This is so pertinent for singles on their first date and during their courtship and as well as for married couples to avoid fights.

Happy Dating and Relationships,

April Braswell

Single Baby Boomer Dating Success Expert

By Keri Eagan on October 17th, 2009 at 9:36 PM

Hi David, Great post. My first thought was ….possibly…. which I guess is cool because it still allows for adding the greater number of options as required to be the person in control (law of req. intent/variety).

Keri Eagan
Alternative*Insight

By Jose Escalante on October 18th, 2009 at 5:20 AM

Curiosity always helps you find great solutions

Jose Escalante
http://www.joseescalante.com

By Steve Chambers on October 18th, 2009 at 7:11 AM

There were some very interesting insights into people’s personalities that were gained from the answers to the question. I really enjoyed this post.

Steve Chambers
Sales Training Speaker

By Martin O'Connor on October 18th, 2009 at 7:50 PM

This is very interesting. I’m going to have to reread it a couple of times.

Martin O’Connor

http://smallbusinessdesigncenter.com

By Scott Payne on October 18th, 2009 at 9:14 PM

Great stuff David
Scott Payne
http://www.scottpayne.me

By Lisa McLellan on October 18th, 2009 at 11:05 PM

This is so interesting. My first thought was number 3 – Yes, if I was to reshape the square peg so it fits! THey were all interesting responses and descriptions.

Lisa McLellan
Babysitting Services – Babysitter in your area

By Lynn Lane on October 19th, 2009 at 12:20 AM

David,

Great way to inform. We all need to stay flexible in our approach.

Lynn Lane

The Warrior Of Success

By Darryl Pace on October 19th, 2009 at 5:15 PM

Asking questions generally will open the door to more information that might be useful to solving a problem.

Health, Fitness for Working People — Darryl Pace

By Mister P on October 19th, 2009 at 6:40 PM

Very illuminating post on the different perspectives people have!

Bert (alter ego- Mister P)
MisterP.org/blog

By Lisa on October 19th, 2009 at 9:47 PM

Really interesting, and it looks like there are a lot of business savy people in here. My first thought was, “How big is the hole and how big is the square peg?”.Assessing the situation is what I usually do first, but I don’t know if I would have taken it so far to ask why a peg was being offered as a solution in the first place.
MissMentor

By Greg Dougall on October 19th, 2009 at 11:24 PM

5. Sure, if the round hole is any bigger than the square peg, it’ll drop through untouched!

Greg Dougall, Literary Agent

By Robert Martin on October 21st, 2009 at 11:21 PM

Thought processes are different for everyone.

Robert Martin
http://www.carbuyinghq.com

By Katie on October 25th, 2009 at 8:34 AM

Excellent! I like the use of the 4 types of response. #4 is surely the most porductive, how do you bring someone to #4 without flat out directing them there?

Katie

By Kate McKeon on October 26th, 2009 at 6:52 AM

I jive, I’m bendable though I would use reference to the willow tree. The problem with using this question is that people respond with a quip, not an real response. It is too cliched to use.

I prefer problems that present a situation that hasn’t been publically hashed so I can respond without the supposed wit.

Kate

Trackbacks

Leave a Comment